December 2, 2008
CEPT as an institution houses diverse discplines, that need a forum to come together, and engage in some interdisciplinary exploration.
Exploring the Sabarmati Riverfront offers an opportunity for the CEPT as a whole to engage with the city on issues of water, agriculture/ nature and built environment.
The different strands of issues and inter-relations emerging in the river basin explorations form the focus of this workshop.
November 28, 2008
(Notes from introduction given by Prof. Chhaya)
The first exercise of the workshop was the analysis of the environs of the entire stretch of the Sabarmati River. The participants were given a Google Earth image of the entire length of the Sabarmati basin and the reading of patterns on the map was discussed. In discussion with the students, it was found that the following could be observed from the google image:
settlements, farmlands, forest areas, eroded bad lands, grazing lands (gochar), estuarine areas, wet lands, industry, linkages/ movement.
In terms of a document, the students were also required to record elevations of places, important landmarks not covered above, and distances from nearest urban centres.
November 27, 2008
Some key ideas suggested by Prof. Kohn
Learning from Patrick Geddes’ ideas of
– Think globally, act locally
– Folk, Work and Place grid – to understand how ‘folk’ or social issues interact with ‘work’ and ‘place’ issues.
– Marcuse’s ‘one-dimensional man’ – where economic considerations dominate all others in society.
(More on this session forthcoming)
November 26, 2008
November 26, 2008
Workshop on Urban and Regional Aspects of the Sabarmati River Development 2008
At the origin of CEPT in 1962, then the School of Architecture, we based the educational programme on the duality of architecture in both its spatial qualities, but also of its deep social responsibility.
Forty-six years later, the world over we are dealing qualitatively with similar issues, obviously far more reaching :
a revaluation of direction and values, and as Amartya Sen would state of social choice towards a more equalitarian society.
Before him, Tagore and Gandhi, and so many others, closely identified India’s specific heritage and direction
with this social imperative which they opposed to more materialistic tendencies which they felt could not be controlled or trusted to take in consideration all segments of society.
In the last weeks, this capitalist value system has shown its fundamental weakness. Mere economic or technical wizardry as clever as they may be are not enough, just as buildings however impressive or even beautiful they may be, fail if they do not embody what Louis Kahn expresses as a “search for meaning in community”.
Obviously this is expressed here a point of view which is personal and needs to be discussed, for as students, as future professionals, educators and as citizens, we are faced with these profound issues of responsibility to each other.
These can have a direct influence on our design decisions which as Gandhi stated must answer to how well they address equally all citizens and especially the poorest.
«…a public project is to be judged on how well it addresses all walks of life, and especially the poorest…»
At this time, Ahmedabad is now faced with a most significant urban and regional project which can be, a marvellous opportunity to express civic choices which integrate fully (or not) these social values
For CEPT, the Sabarmati project, both the river basin and the river front, is likewise an unequalled opportunity
to bring together all the disciplines which contribute to the making of meaningful environments.
Design methodology : from past to present to future :
We do not exist in isolation.
From a position in the present :
– we are aware of the influences of the past that have contributed to the making of our environment and of ourselves,
– that today, our actions in a specific field have lateral ramifications
into other areas of study,
– and obviously that they will in turn influence the future.
Proposed programme of study: Sabarmati River Basin
HOURS : 10:00 – 12:30 14:30 – 17:00
lectures, metings : 17:30
WEEK 1 nov. 24 – 29
Monday Nov 24 :
1 – Positioning ourselves :
– Why this workshop?
– Why are we concerned? & are we concerned ?
– Who we are, where we are, where we want to go?
2 – CEPT communities involvement with community over the years.
3 – The Sabarmati River Basin from its birth to the Gulf of Khambat… Wednesday Nov26 :
understanding the issues to the best of our abilities.
4 – General workshop organization
Tuesday Nov 25 :
Along the 300 kilometres length, one can conceive of a series of ecological entities.
Students in groups of 12 ( two from each faculty) can position
themselves in one geographic area, or in a “longitudinal” strand of a reccuring problem / situation / issues.
Thursday Nov 27 :
Each group outlines its approach and work methodology in terms of “folk/work/place , that is :
– the people and the social considerations and issues including
– the activities be they agricultural, crafts, industry,
– and the multitude of built and environmental factors
and their interactions with each other and in relation to the Sabarmati river.
Friday Nov 28 :
Brief presentation by each group of :
– where they are, the issues that they have chosen to address, – and where they believe they are going.
– contrasting scenarios and their consequences over time.
WEEK 2 dec.1 – 5 Monday Dec 1 :
– presentation by each group (using A3 format).
A- the exisitng situation and official projects as they stand today.
B- alternative ecological scenario. C- a “third” way ?
Tuesday Dec 4 onwards :
Focusing on Ahmedabad, and the interface of vision / issues / realities with the Sabarmati river.
WEEK 3 dec.8 – 12
Synthesis and presentation
Proposed programme of study : Sabarmati River Basin
1- Concerning the Sabarmati River Project :
– Evaluation of the original 1962 proposal, its objectives,
those who were involved…
– over the years…, how the proposal has developed,
– where we are today : presentation of the plans
2- Illustrated references of responses to rivers :
– in history, in India and elsewhere, recent approaches,
analysis and issues.
3- Mobility : Comparison of alternative public movement systems which can be opposed or complimentory to “all road” solutions :
– people friendly “soft” tramways,
– consequences in time of each solution in terms of economic development, urban fabric, environmental issues, social interaction.
4- Proposed design approach :
– understanding issues,
– facing them,
– positioning ourselves.
5- The use of the pattern language :
– the pattern language constitutes an excellent “thinking” tool.
– we propose the elaboration of a series of examples of the patterns of the many day to day uses of the river, be they cultural,
religious, economic, leisure…
6- Some books which may constitute a the
beginning” of a reference base :
– Christopher Alexander “The pattern Language”,
– Patrick Geddes : the Indian proposals – 1915-1920
– Ivan Illich
– Amartya Sen
– Louis I Kahn…
For the two approaches, i.e. the longview and the short view, that is :
– the Sabarmati river basin,
– and the Ahmedabad riverfronts,
we need to identify resource persons who are susceptible to be called upon, interviewed.
Resource people may be :
– professionals, political persons, institutions, individuals who are concerned.
For the Sabarmati river basin :
– Obviously, a review of whatever has been planned, done over the last forty years in terms of river basin management.
– persons in the field of ecology, water management, soil erosion,
re-forestation, pollution, water availability , water table and water purity…
For the Ahmedabad portion :
– those involved in the fields of social sciences, citizen’s participation, housing, views on the “sharing of resources” by all citizens…
Resource “people”, institutions, administrations, groups and individuals…
«de-fibering» a complex structure in order to better analyse, understand its components.
the «grid» of Patrick Geddes :
interactions of Folk / Work / Place as two way processes, where each acts and is reacted upon by the other.
during the entire workshop we should aim at working together in a spirit of exchange and sharing with a good degree of informality and humour.
We should aim at being able to communicate
in addition to exchanges in the workshop, we may aim at being able to communicate and interact with a larger public
– with the CEPT community,
– to the larger Ahmedabad community
exhibition in a public library
exhibition in a public square – market day
can we reach a larger public ?
conclusion of a workshop
F r a n c e
I n d i a